Thread #11002

Disabling Auto Image Resize?

12 archived posts · 1,085 historical views

chrispyMay 5, 2008
#153676

Disabling Auto Image Resize?

Is there any way to disable the image resizer? I love seeing pics but I hate clicking every single one to view them in full size. The worse part is that it doesn't load any faster, it still has to load the entire picture before resizing it. Can you guys add it as an option in the control panel?
View original BBCode
Is there any way to disable the image resizer? I love seeing pics but I hate clicking every single one to view them in full size. The worse part is that it doesn't load any faster, it still has to load the entire picture before resizing it. Can you guys add it as an option in the control panel?
mdenogaMay 5, 2008
#153683
The reason there is an auto resizer is to keep things a consistent size as well as minimize the amount of data on a thread. Even if I wanted to give that option, I would have talk to site coder Brian aka |crash|. I do not plan to change. Sorry bro.
View original BBCode
The reason there is an auto resizer is to keep things a consistent size as well as minimize the amount of data on a thread. Even if I wanted to give that option, I would have talk to site coder Brian aka |crash|. I do not plan to change. Sorry bro.
SikNLowMay 5, 2008
#153743
I agree with Mike on this one... there's no reason for it, as it was we had issues with the way, not speed, that the page loaded..... we used to end up having pages that looked like a tetris nightmare hahahahaha
View original BBCode
I agree with Mike on this one... there's no reason for it, as it was we had issues with the way, not speed, that the page loaded..... we used to end up having pages that looked like a tetris nightmare hahahahaha
SandeezyMay 6, 2008
#154145
EDIT:
I like auto resizer. I hate it when pictures are all big and outta place, it frustrates me.
View original BBCode
EDIT:
I like auto resizer. I hate it when pictures are all big and outta place, it frustrates me.
J StuffMay 13, 2008
#155648
i dont like it because everything is fuzzy.
View original BBCode
i dont like it because everything is fuzzy.
mdenogaMay 13, 2008
#155693
J Stuff;155648 wrote:i dont like it because everything is fuzzy.


That I agree with you there. But until we find another alternative its going to stay. Sorry guys.
View original BBCode
[quote=J Stuff;155648]i dont like it because everything is fuzzy.[/quote]
 
That I agree with you there. But until we find another alternative its going to stay. Sorry guys.
SikNLowMay 13, 2008
#155738
other alternative is to have poeple be a little more conscious about what they are posting and resize the images..... :shrug:
View original BBCode
other alternative is to have poeple be a little more conscious about what they are posting and resize the images..... :shrug:
chrispyMay 13, 2008
#155855
But we love hi res pictures. It's like car porn. Do you like your porn in thumbnails? :P

I guess I just have to deal with it.
View original BBCode
But we love hi res pictures. It's like car porn. Do you like your porn in thumbnails? :P

I guess I just have to deal with it.
mdenogaMay 14, 2008
#155965
SikNLow;155738 wrote:other alternative is to have poeple be a little more conscious about what they are posting and resize the images..... :shrug:

...which will make it more tedious for the user. Auto re-size fixes this problem and benefits both of us.
View original BBCode
[quote=SikNLow;155738]other alternative is to have poeple be a little more conscious about what they are posting and resize the images..... :shrug:[/quote]
...which will make it more tedious for the user. Auto re-size fixes this problem and benefits both of us.
firelizardMay 14, 2008
#156095
Is it possible to have an option to turn it off in the User CP? That would benefit everybody I think.
View original BBCode
Is it possible to have an option to turn it off in the User CP? That would benefit everybody I think.
SikNLowMay 15, 2008
#156256
the mechanics behind trying to allow users that option, is way more sophisticated and difficult than thought and would probably end up badly for everyone since the outcome might be one f'ed up looking page where you have no option hahahahaha

believe me we are fine and pages load a bit better and faster although it doesn't seem like it!:biggthumpup:
View original BBCode
the mechanics behind trying to allow users that option, is way more sophisticated and difficult than thought and would probably end up badly for everyone since the outcome might be one f'ed up looking page where you have no option hahahahaha
 
believe me we are fine and pages load a bit better and faster although it doesn't seem like it!:biggthumpup: