Thread #14942

Need Offset Help... For IS300, 18x8.5/18x9.5

15 archived posts · 6,746 historical views

"that boy asad"December 13, 2008
#212289

Need Offset Help... For IS300, 18x8.5/18x9.5

What is the best offsets for the is300 if i want to get... 18x8.5 / 18x9.5 rims, i'm also going to be dropping my car more than 3 inches!

i don't mind doing any SAFE fender mods, which would be the best... shaving, pulling, or rolling?

also, i found a set of rims that are +40 for the fronts and +45 in the rears... would that work and what tire size would be ideal for it?

- thanks
View original BBCode
What is the best offsets for the is300 if i want to get... 18x8.5 / 18x9.5 rims, i'm also going to be dropping my car more than 3 inches!

i don't mind doing any SAFE fender mods, which would be the best... shaving, pulling, or rolling?

also, i found a set of rims that are +40 for the fronts and +45 in the rears... would that work and what tire size would be ideal for it?

- thanks
johgarDecember 13, 2008
#212305
I believe the +45 is safe for the IS300. Run 245/35 front and 265/35 rear.
View original BBCode
I believe the +45 is safe for the IS300. Run 245/35 front and 265/35 rear.
"that boy asad"December 13, 2008
#212307
another decision i cant make is... to go with silver rims or gold, my car is black onyx
View original BBCode
another decision i cant make is... to go with silver rims or gold, my car is black onyx
airmaxDecember 13, 2008
#212310
stay silver homie...gold gets old...trust me, been there done that.
View original BBCode
stay silver homie...gold gets old...trust me, been there done that.
vip tint+glassDecember 13, 2008
#212366
you can go 18x 8.5/9.5 +35 all around with a good strech and camber, no pull just roll
View original BBCode
you can go 18x 8.5/9.5 +35 all around  with a good strech and camber, no pull just roll
actolexDecember 15, 2008
#212596
We ran 19x8.5 +35 19x9.5 +30 with the fenders rolled and pulled a little:


Forum image

Forum image

Forum image

Forum image

Forum image



Tire size is also important. We ran 225-35-19 and 235-35-19. Also, tire brand is important too. Dunlop SportMaxx have a really wide tread, just as a reference. Oh, the AME's are both Hi-Disk and large back pads which is why the lip is small.
View original BBCode
We ran 19x8.5 +35 19x9.5 +30 with the fenders rolled and pulled a little:
 
 
[IMG]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/actolex/Misc/DSC_1259.jpg[/IMG]
 
[IMG]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/actolex/Misc/DSC_1275.jpg[/IMG]
 
[IMG]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/actolex/Misc/DSC_1263.jpg[/IMG]
 
[IMG]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/actolex/Misc/DSC_1238.jpg[/IMG]
 
[IMG]http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b13/actolex/Misc/DSC_1246.jpg[/IMG]
 
 
 
Tire size is also important. We ran 225-35-19 and 235-35-19. Also, tire brand is important too. Dunlop SportMaxx have a really wide tread, just as a reference.  Oh, the AME's are both Hi-Disk and large back pads which is why the lip is small.
BlitzDecember 15, 2008
#212638
thats the problem with these IS....can't fit lower offsets even with a RWD chassis.
View original BBCode
thats the problem with these IS....can't fit lower offsets even with a RWD chassis.
charley240sxDecember 15, 2008
#212716
dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley
View original BBCode
dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley
actolexDecember 15, 2008
#212719
charley240sx;212716 wrote:dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley



Weak or not....that's about all we could fit under the fender after rolling and pulling. The first gen IS a smaller 4 door. The 2nd gen can get a more aggressive setup. We're running 19x9 +22 and 19x10 +22 on our red one.

Forum image
View original BBCode
[quote=charley240sx;212716]dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley[/quote]
 
 
Weak or not....that's about all we could fit under the fender after rolling and pulling.  The first gen IS a smaller 4 door.  The 2nd gen can get a more aggressive setup.  We're running 19x9 +22 and 19x10 +22 on our red one.
 
[img]http://www.clublexus.com/gallery/data//3453/DSC_2175.jpg[/img]
"that boy asad"December 15, 2008
#212720
charley240sx;212716 wrote:dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley

i loved the fitment you have on your es300, you were the reason i got myself an es300...
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=charley240sx;212716]dang, thats weak. i fit better et and my car is fwd, i figured almost all rwd can handle a good amount of offset, iguess not is'. but that blue one does look nice.
Charley[/QUOTE]
i loved the fitment you have on your es300, you were the reason i got myself an es300...
charley240sxDecember 15, 2008
#212740
thanks
btw, actolex, im not trying to put your work or anyones work down, i just figured rwd, more lip. but ntl, nice rides.
charley
View original BBCode
thanks
btw, actolex, im not trying to put your work or anyones work down, i just figured rwd, more lip. but ntl, nice rides.
charley
actolexDecember 15, 2008
#212755
charley240sx;212740 wrote:thanks
btw, actolex, im not trying to put your work or anyones work down, i just figured rwd, more lip. but ntl, nice rides.
charley



Oh....no worries. I knew what you were saying...:biggthumpup:
View original BBCode
[quote=charley240sx;212740]thanks
btw, actolex, im not trying to put your work or anyones work down, i just figured rwd, more lip. but ntl, nice rides.
charley[/quote]
 
 
Oh....no worries.  I knew what you were saying...:biggthumpup:
IS3_FTWJanuary 12, 2009
#219475
Blitz;212638 wrote:thats the problem with these IS....can't fit lower offsets even with a RWD chassis.


The thing about the IS300's, is that its a RWD with a FWD chassis:pat::runcoold::shrug:

Thats why the stockers are 17x7 +45 all around :slap:
View original BBCode
[quote=Blitz;212638]thats the problem with these IS....can't fit lower offsets even with a RWD chassis.[/quote]
 
The thing about the IS300's, is that its a RWD with a FWD chassis:pat::runcoold::shrug:
 
Thats why the stockers are 17x7 +45 all around :slap:
jeebusJanuary 12, 2009
#219654
actolex;212719 wrote:Weak or not....that's about all we could fit under the fender after rolling and pulling. The first gen IS a smaller 4 door. The 2nd gen can get a more aggressive setup. We're running 19x9 +22 and 19x10 +22 on our red one.

Forum image


Dope IS.:biggthumpup:. Both of them.
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=actolex;212719]Weak or not....that's about all we could fit under the fender after rolling and pulling.  The first gen IS a smaller 4 door.  The 2nd gen can get a more aggressive setup.  We're running 19x9 +22 and 19x10 +22 on our red one.
 
[img]http://www.clublexus.com/gallery/data//3453/DSC_2175.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]

Dope IS.:biggthumpup:. Both of them.