Thread #15261

my ls400 tucking 17's?! whaaaaa

32 archived posts · 6,432 historical views

walkaJanuary 1, 2009
#217013

my ls400 tucking 17's?! whaaaaa

and no its not on bags and this isnt photoshopped its on megan coils foolss. the frame is on the ground
Forum image
Forum image
View original BBCode
and no its not on bags and this isnt photoshopped its on megan coils foolss. the frame is on the ground
[IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/macneilbmx095/_MG_9965.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y284/macneilbmx095/_MG_9964.jpg[/IMG]
vzuptnguyenJanuary 1, 2009
#217015
wow those are small wheels. minimum is 18's on ls400's man. thats the unwritten law. haha. other than that its nice.
View original BBCode
wow those are small wheels. minimum is 18's on ls400's man. thats the unwritten law. haha. other than that its nice.
walkaJanuary 1, 2009
#217018
vzuptnguyen;217015 wrote:wow those are small wheels. minimum is 18's on ls400's man. thats the unwritten law. haha. other than that its nice.

yep they are the wheels off my silvia. thought it would be dope to fit them on a big body car
View original BBCode
[quote=vzuptnguyen;217015]wow those are small wheels. minimum is 18's on ls400's man. thats the unwritten law. haha. other than that its nice.[/quote]
yep they are the wheels off my silvia. thought it would be dope to fit them on a big body car
CaoboyJanuary 1, 2009
#217019
Cookie?
View original BBCode
Cookie?
PANCAKES!January 1, 2009
#217021
Hhahahahahhaha! but that's not tucking! LOL!
and at that height unless you add more camber I still don't see it tucking

I agree though 18s are minimum.
Damn! I guess we gonna see 16s, than 15s next! :pat:

I probably would have did the same jus for fun and curiosity! :shrug:
View original BBCode
Hhahahahahhaha! but that's not tucking! LOL!
and at that height unless you add more camber I still don't see it tucking

I agree though 18s are minimum. 
Damn! I guess we gonna see 16s, than 15s next! :pat:

I probably would have did the same jus for fun and curiosity! :shrug:
walkaJanuary 1, 2009
#217025
PANCAKES!;217021 wrote:Hhahahahahhaha! but that's not tucking! LOL!
and at that height unless you add more camber I still don't see it tucking

I agree though 18s are minimum.
Damn! I guess we gonna see 16s, than 15s next! :pat:

I probably would have did the same jus for fun and curiosity! :shrug:

well i guess im not tucking but still i really cant go lower or its not even possible to drive.

and i agree 18's are a min aswell...it was just a test fit but you guys probably just gonna all hate anways
View original BBCode
[quote=PANCAKES!;217021]Hhahahahahhaha! but that's not tucking! LOL!
and at that height unless you add more camber I still don't see it tucking

I agree though 18s are minimum. 
Damn! I guess we gonna see 16s, than 15s next! :pat:

I probably would have did the same jus for fun and curiosity! :shrug:[/quote]
well i guess im not tucking but still i really cant go lower or its not even possible to drive.

and i agree 18's are a min aswell...it was just a test fit but you guys probably just gonna all hate anways
CaoboyJanuary 1, 2009
#217026
There were some OLD pictures of some 'beginning' vip cars....transitioning from yankee style to what is now vip, and they would have some WIDE 15's and 16's...think those old school yankee wheels, on a first gen LS, back when the first gens were the new hot shit.
View original BBCode
There were some OLD pictures of some 'beginning' vip cars....transitioning from yankee style to what is now vip, and they would have some WIDE 15's and 16's...think those old school yankee wheels, on a first gen LS, back when the first gens were the new hot shit.
OGJanuary 1, 2009
#217028
looks kinda ill if you ask me. looks a tad weak on the fitment side though. if you're not tuckin rim you gotta be super flush. is the frame literally on the ground or is it drivable?
View original BBCode
looks kinda ill if you ask me. looks a tad weak on the fitment side though.  if you're not tuckin rim you gotta be super flush. is the frame literally on the ground or is it drivable?
walkaJanuary 1, 2009
#217030
BLKonBLK98;217028 wrote:looks kinda ill if you ask me. looks a tad weak on the fitment side though. if you're not tuckin rim you gotta be super flush. is the frame literally on the ground or is it drivable?

ive been driving it for like a day now and have been fine but the frame is really like just cm's from the ground.
View original BBCode
[quote=BLKonBLK98;217028]looks kinda ill if you ask me. looks a tad weak on the fitment side though.  if you're not tuckin rim you gotta be super flush. is the frame literally on the ground or is it drivable?[/quote]
ive been driving it for like a day now and have been fine but the frame is really like just cm's from the ground.
PANCAKES!January 1, 2009
#217034
walka;217025 wrote:-it was just a test fit but you guys probably just gonna all hate anways


Not hating at all! Do you son!
I told you I'd probably do the same, since anything is better than stock! :biggthumpup:
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=walka;217025]-it was just a test fit but you guys probably just gonna all hate anways[/QUOTE]

Not hating at all! Do you son!
I told you I'd probably do the same, since anything is better than stock! :biggthumpup:
augdoggJanuary 2, 2009
#217063
I have to agree it looks ill! But, although a test fit for humor, 17's make that car a hella big body...if those wheels had more offset, i'd say you on wit yer bad self...
View original BBCode
I have to agree it looks ill! But, although a test fit for humor, 17's make that car a hella big body...if those wheels had more offset, i'd say you on wit yer bad self...
shawnthemonsterJanuary 2, 2009
#217136
looks sick i think. i personally would like bigger wheels but thats me. still looks good tho.
View original BBCode
looks sick i think. i personally would like bigger wheels but thats me. still looks good tho.
fatfreeJanuary 2, 2009
#217142
I think it looks good. You should put some spacers on there. I bet it'll look really good flushed.
View original BBCode
I think it looks good.  You should put some spacers on there.  I bet it'll look really good flushed.
firelizardJanuary 2, 2009
#217149
oh, lol

As I clicked I was trying to picture it tucking rim.

This is cool though, I have no issues with 17s on an LS, the stance is more important imo. With more aggressive wheels that could work fine.

Personally I'd do 18" as well though, so that you can have zero tire showing.
View original BBCode
oh, lol

As I clicked I was trying to picture it tucking rim.

This is cool though, I have no issues with 17s on an LS, the stance is more important imo. With more aggressive wheels that could work fine.

Personally I'd do 18" as well though, so that you can have zero tire showing.
jboJanuary 2, 2009
#217151
That joint is on slam bruh it would look even sicker with some larger more aggressive wheels though imo but nicely done so far...
View original BBCode
That joint is on slam bruh it would look even sicker with some larger more aggressive wheels though imo but nicely done so far...
walkaJanuary 2, 2009
#217175
thanks for all the positive comments guys! the wheels are 17x8.5 and 17x10 but im going to put 25mm spacers in the rear and 10mm spacers up front tomorrow. it should be pretty flush
View original BBCode
thanks for all the positive comments guys! the wheels are 17x8.5 and 17x10 but im going to put 25mm spacers in the rear and 10mm spacers up front tomorrow. it should be pretty flush
JN.FYCJanuary 2, 2009
#217177
that shit looks mean! i'm digging it
View original BBCode
that shit looks mean! i'm digging it
phatboiJanuary 2, 2009
#217187
car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??
View original BBCode
car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??
walkaJanuary 6, 2009
#218087
phatboi;217187 wrote:car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??

haha no its not
View original BBCode
[quote=phatboi;217187]car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??[/quote]
haha no its not
clean9945January 6, 2009
#218093
did you put the spacers on yet?
View original BBCode
did you put the spacers on yet?
romeo291January 6, 2009
#218106
Off topic, but those ramps in the background are freaking sweet. I am a skater, so that's the first thing I noticed, haha.
View original BBCode
Off topic, but those ramps in the background are freaking sweet.  I am a skater, so that's the first thing I noticed, haha.
walkaJanuary 7, 2009
#218453
haha yeah that is a foam pit. i ride bikes so thats how i learn how to do all those crazy flip tricks and next to it is a box jump/quarter pipe
View original BBCode
haha yeah that is a foam pit. i ride bikes so thats how i learn how to do all those crazy flip tricks and next to it is a box jump/quarter pipe
walkaJanuary 16, 2009
#221041
phatboi;217187 wrote:car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??

its a glow in the dark license plate :)
View original BBCode
[quote=phatboi;217187]car would look better with 18s i say, with about a 9jj+20/10jj+25...

btw is that a light up license plate??[/quote]
its a glow in the dark license plate :)
dub40sxJanuary 20, 2009
#221823
thats sick man. Love how dumped it is. Those 17s look sooooo tiny on an ls.
View original BBCode
thats sick man. Love how dumped it is. Those 17s look sooooo tiny on an ls.
radiokillaFebruary 20, 2011
#372448
just stumbled on this. i bet that kills the secondary mufflers lol. layinnn fraaaaaame!!! i like it
View original BBCode
just stumbled on this. i bet that kills the secondary mufflers lol. layinnn fraaaaaame!!! i like it
dnice78February 22, 2011
#372853
I don't mind it for a temp setup, Looks pretty good IMO.
View original BBCode
I don't mind it for a temp setup, Looks pretty good IMO.
plusonechoiMarch 11, 2011
#376066
old thread....but 17s really look too small for an LS. 18s and up for sure!
View original BBCode
old thread....but 17s really look too small for an LS. 18s and up for sure!
o2 jockeyMarch 11, 2011
#376091
doesnt look too bad to me at all. that sucker cant get any lower.
View original BBCode
doesnt look too bad to me at all. that sucker cant get any lower.
elpresidenteMarch 11, 2011
#376094
WW....you crazy man. lol
View original BBCode
WW....you crazy man.  lol
luisfriasMarch 28, 2011
#379181
dam @#$% is low .. looks good
View original BBCode
dam @#$% is low .. looks good