Thread #27105

Reverse mounting affecting offset

30 archived posts · 6,938 historical views

4DGSAugust 25, 2011
#407748

Reverse mounting affecting offset

I've been searching for this and have come up with a million answers..

I need to know as precisely as possible how much reverse or front mounting affects the offset change on 3 piece wheels.

They're work Equips 01, I know a tonn of you guys have built works before so let me know!
View original BBCode
I've been searching for this and have come up with a million answers..

I need to know as precisely as possible how much reverse or front mounting affects the offset change on 3 piece wheels.

They're work Equips 01, I know a tonn of you guys have built works before so let me know!
Rodneyc77August 25, 2011
#407751
Do the Math... it's simple...
View original BBCode
Do the Math... it's simple...
lamsvAugust 25, 2011
#407752
Since you aren't changing the width, you are lowering the offset by how ever much you move the wheel back. So, if the mounting flange of the barrel is 10mm thick, you move the center to the back side of the flange, you lower the offset by 10mm.
View original BBCode
Since you aren't changing the width, you are lowering the offset by how ever much you move the wheel back. So, if the mounting flange of the barrel is 10mm thick, you move the center to the back side of the flange, you lower the offset by 10mm.
Rodneyc77August 25, 2011
#407760
not really Iamsv... it's a whole other measurement cause you're changing what is positive and what is negative offset because the front of the wheel has changed... cause if you have a positive offset wheel (depending on how much)... when you reverse the face... you can have a very negative offset wheel... cause you're mounting surface is now very much behind the true centerline of the wheel measured from centerline of the wheel away from the new front of the wheel...
View original BBCode
not really Iamsv... it's a whole other measurement cause you're changing what is positive and what is negative offset because the front of the wheel has changed... cause if you have a positive offset wheel (depending on how much)... when you reverse the face... you can have a very negative offset wheel... cause you're mounting surface is now very much behind the true centerline of the wheel measured from centerline of the wheel away from the new front of the wheel...
4DGSAugust 25, 2011
#407764
Center line of the mount... not of the center of the wheel itself.

If you were flipping the face the other way around and mounting using the rear barrel as the front lip and the lip as the barrel then you would have a point... But this is just a forward or backwards movement, only affecting offset by however much the face has moved in or out.

I need to find out how think the lip and rear barrel are at the mounting surface.
View original BBCode
Center line of the mount... not of the center of the wheel itself.

If you were flipping the face the other way around and mounting using the rear barrel as the front lip and the lip as the barrel then you would have a point... But this is just a forward or backwards movement, only affecting offset by however much the face has moved in or out.

I need to find out how think the lip and rear barrel are at the mounting surface.
lamsvAugust 25, 2011
#407772
I don't think he is flipping the wheel center, just moving the mounting point to behind the flanges? If I read his post correctly.
View original BBCode
I don't think he is flipping the wheel center, just moving the mounting point to behind the flanges? If I read his post correctly.
brainneededAugust 25, 2011
#407773
rodney, he's talking about moving the face from behind the flange to the front of the flange, not reversing the face on the barrel.
View original BBCode
rodney, he's talking about moving the face from behind the flange to the front of the flange, not reversing the face on the barrel.
Rodneyc77August 25, 2011
#407775
yeah I got it... Should be even simpler... LOL... =)

I would be concerned whether or not the barrel and face where made to be attached in the either/or position...
View original BBCode
yeah I got it... Should be even simpler... LOL... =)
 
I would be concerned whether or not the barrel and face where made to be attached in the either/or position...
4DGSAugust 25, 2011
#407804
This is what reverse mounting is...

BBS and Equips been doin it for years!
View original BBCode
This is what reverse mounting is...

BBS and Equips been doin it for years!
4DGSAugust 25, 2011
#407807
Sorry crap photo, left is reverse mounted, front is front mount.

Forum image


Anyways, finally figured it out, it's 12mm
View original BBCode
Sorry crap photo, left is reverse mounted, front is front mount.

[IMG]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5134/5483575773_bb01eb9635.jpg[/IMG]


Anyways, finally figured it out, it's 12mm
SIMPLE G50August 25, 2011
#407810
what i see you is you changed the mounting by sandwiching the face with the lip and barrel. Measure the thickness of the face and thats how much you decreased the offset. but you also widened the wheel by the much.
View original BBCode
what i see you is you changed the mounting by sandwiching the face with the lip and barrel. Measure the thickness of the face and thats how much you decreased the offset. but you also widened the wheel by the much.
OGAugust 25, 2011
#407818
thickness of face and flang at mounting point combined. front mount being a positive offset change. width is unaffected.
View original BBCode
thickness of face and flang at mounting point combined. front mount being a positive offset change. width is unaffected.
BlitzAugust 26, 2011
#407836
OG;407818 wrote:thickness of face and flang at mounting point combined. front mount being a positive offset change. width is unaffected.


thickness of face where it bolts up to the flange and flange itself thickness combined. Not to be confused with thickness of entire face or pad size.

I dunno... I figure someone might get confused. I know what you meant though OG

So OG is saying in this pic measure where the flange bolts go...on the barrel and on the face.
Forum image

Picture isn't a great example... the BBS LM are better since the face mounting side is flat both sides.
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=OG;407818]thickness of face and flang at mounting point combined. front mount being a positive offset change. width is unaffected.[/QUOTE]

thickness of face where it bolts up to the flange and flange itself thickness combined.   Not to be confused with thickness of entire face or pad size.

I dunno... I figure someone might get confused.   I know what you meant though OG

So OG is saying in this pic measure where the flange bolts go...on the barrel and on the face.
[IMG]http://www.m3post.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=339997&stc=1&d=1263004536[/IMG]

Picture isn't a great example... the BBS LM are better since the face mounting side is flat both sides.
OGAugust 26, 2011
#407845
correct. it was hard to word.
View original BBCode
correct. it was hard to word.
speedaddictAugust 26, 2011
#407860
its easier to figure out than it is to reply to the thread and word it correctly :smiley-rofl:
View original BBCode
its easier to figure out than it is to reply to the thread and word it correctly :smiley-rofl:
lamsvAugust 26, 2011
#407866
^ This. It is easier on a BBS wheel because most are 2 piece (BBS LM, LM-R, etc). Much harder on a 3 piece, as you can either move it to the back of the inner barrel (which is easy to calculate the change as you don't change the width of the wheel), or sandwich the center, which does change the width of the overall wheel, and requires a bit more math....
View original BBCode
^ This. It is easier on a BBS wheel because most are 2 piece (BBS LM, LM-R, etc). Much harder on a 3 piece, as you can either move it to the back of the inner barrel (which is easy to calculate the change as you don't change the width of the wheel), or sandwich the center, which does change the width of the overall wheel, and requires a bit more math....
BlitzAugust 26, 2011
#407893
lamsv;407866 wrote:^ This. It is easier on a BBS wheel because most are 2 piece (BBS LM, LM-R, etc). Much harder on a 3 piece, as you can either move it to the back of the inner barrel (which is easy to calculate the change as you don't change the width of the wheel), or sandwich the center, which does change the width of the overall wheel, and requires a bit more math....


I would think the only rims able to do this are rims with faces that allow the face to be bolted on the underside of the flange rather than on top of the flange. Such as BBS LMs. A rim face like VS-XX wouldn't be able to because it woudn't bolt up correctly once moved to the underside of the flange.
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=lamsv;407866]^ This. It is easier on a BBS wheel because most are 2 piece (BBS LM, LM-R, etc). Much harder on a 3 piece, as you can either move it to the back of the inner barrel (which is easy to calculate the change as you don't change the width of the wheel), or sandwich the center, which does change the width of the overall wheel, and requires a bit more math....[/QUOTE]

I would think the only rims able to do this are rims with faces that allow the face to be bolted on the underside of the flange rather than on top of the flange.  Such as BBS LMs.   A rim face like VS-XX wouldn't be able to because it woudn't bolt up correctly once moved to the underside of the flange.
lamsvAugust 26, 2011
#407905
Yep. Mounting flange on the center has to be perfectly flat on the front and back.
View original BBCode
Yep. Mounting flange on the center has to be perfectly flat on the front and back.
BAHCAugust 26, 2011
#407919
almost seems pointless regardless in my eyes.
View original BBCode
almost seems pointless regardless in my eyes.
nokcy21August 26, 2011
#407923
Most wheels you can't evn do this
View original BBCode
Most wheels you can't evn do this
lamsvAugust 26, 2011
#407962
It is the same concept as milling down the mounting flange to make it a higher offset. If you can flip the center, it keeps you from having to use spacers to get better fitment. You can fine tune your fitment with out resorting to spacers or new barrels.
View original BBCode
It is the same concept as milling down the mounting flange to make it a higher offset. If you can flip the center, it keeps you from having to use spacers to get better fitment. You can fine tune your fitment with out resorting to spacers or new barrels.
JN.FYCAugust 26, 2011
#407983
So a sandwich mount, Barrel | Face | Barrel?
If so, it depends on the face of the wheel. From what i've seen, what they do is they mill down flange. Basically cutting it down to where it is FLAT to sit flush between the two barrels. Depending on the face of a rim, some will be easier than others. Although i've seen concave type of faces done with sandwich faces.
Doing this can definitely change a ugly wheel into a sweet looking one.


So before most of you think it can't be done, it can. It takes innovation & creativity, always gotta be ahead of the game.
Although, it seems more for aesthetics?

I've seen a couple wheels done, i've seen also seen VS-XX with a sandwich face, oh how sweet did it look...
View original BBCode
So a sandwich mount, Barrel | Face | Barrel?
If so, it depends on the face of the wheel. From what i've seen, what they do is they mill down flange.  Basically cutting it down to where it is FLAT to sit flush between the two barrels. Depending on the face of a rim, some will be easier than others. Although i've seen concave type of faces done with sandwich faces.
Doing this can definitely change a ugly wheel into a sweet looking one. 


So before most of you think it can't be done, it can. It takes innovation & creativity, always gotta be ahead of the game.
Although, it seems more for aesthetics?

I've seen a couple wheels done,  i've seen also seen VS-XX with a sandwich face, oh how sweet did it look...
JN.FYCAugust 26, 2011
#407986
Few examples of a WORK EQUIP wheel.
Before,
Forum image

After,
Forum image
View original BBCode
Few examples of a WORK EQUIP wheel.
Before, 
[IMG]http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/228930_173029806098806_100001753641118_386744_3744181_n.jpg[/IMG]

After, 
[IMG]http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/205998_173029796098807_100001753641118_386743_3437094_n.jpg[/IMG]
chik-n-littleAugust 26, 2011
#407992
Now thats a lotta lip
View original BBCode
Now thats a lotta lip
BlitzAugust 27, 2011
#408023
JN.FYC;407986 wrote:Few examples of a WORK EQUIP wheel.
Before,
Forum image

After,
Forum image


First one is a DDC lip

Second is a some kind of reverse lip
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=JN.FYC;407986]Few examples of a WORK EQUIP wheel.
Before, 
[IMG]http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/228930_173029806098806_100001753641118_386744_3744181_n.jpg[/IMG]

After, 
[IMG]http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/205998_173029796098807_100001753641118_386743_3437094_n.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

First one is a DDC lip

Second is a some kind of reverse lip
OGAugust 27, 2011
#408026
yeah... orientation hasn't changed on that equip, it just went from ddc to custom drill reverse. it is sexy though.
View original BBCode
yeah... orientation hasn't changed on that equip, it just went from ddc to custom drill reverse. it is sexy though.
AGI@LuxuryAbstractAugust 27, 2011
#408049
I was under the impression you meant flip the face. There is no set number on that since the disk sizes vary along with the profile of the face.

Just reverse mounting the face would be as mentioned 12-13mm's. Also as mentioned, you cant with all wheels. The mounting surface has to be flat.

On some really thick wheels, the difference would be up to 25mm's but on most wheels, it would be 12-13mm's. Just measure the part that mounts to the barrel to get your answer. Mount it reverse, subtract the 12-13mm's.
View original BBCode
I was under the impression you meant flip the face.  There is no set number on that since the disk sizes vary along with the profile of the face.

Just reverse mounting the face would be as mentioned 12-13mm's.  Also as mentioned, you cant with all wheels.  The mounting surface has to be flat.

On some really thick wheels, the difference would be up to 25mm's but on most wheels, it would be 12-13mm's.  Just measure the part that mounts to the barrel to get your answer.  Mount it reverse, subtract the 12-13mm's.
JN.FYCAugust 27, 2011
#408069
OOOPS!
I have no idea why i posted that. lol
View original BBCode
OOOPS!
I have no idea why i posted that. lol
eastonAugust 27, 2011
#408079
always wondered the same thing
View original BBCode
always wondered the same thing
4DGSAugust 29, 2011
#408238
BAHC;407919 wrote:almost seems pointless regardless in my eyes.


Not when you're rebuilding wheels with low offsets to begin with.

IE, 18x10 +22 Build it to an 11 with just lips and you have a +10 on 11". My G can't handle that so I need to increase the offset by at least 10mm in order to not add more camber or have my work cut out for me with the roller.

Everything has it's purpose.

Thank you OG, I wasn't sure if it was just the width of the flange or if it was flange + face!
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=BAHC;407919]almost seems pointless regardless in my eyes.[/QUOTE]

Not when you're rebuilding wheels with low offsets to begin with.

IE, 18x10 +22 Build it to an 11 with just lips and you have a +10 on 11". My G can't handle that so I need to increase the offset by at least 10mm in order to not add more camber or have my work cut out for me with the roller.

Everything has it's purpose.

Thank you OG, I wasn't sure if it was just the width of the flange or if it was flange + face!