Stance: Chassis parallel to road OR even wheel well gap all around?

There are many cars that have a taller, front wheel fender opening than the rear when the chassis is level to the ground.

In this case, which do you guys prefer the stance to be?  For me, I like the chassis to be parallel to the ground, which means the rear wheel will be much more tucked in the fender than the front.  But when I have this kind of stance, many people keep saying "you need to lower the front, it's too high", and that all  my rim VS fender gap needs to be all the same.

IMO, I don't like the "hot rod" look.  Just wondering which do you guys prefer for your own cars?

Chassis even if either.

 Ultimately, radiused arches for the best of both worlds.

Yup, i always go for chassis parallel. On my car, even fender gap looks especially raked. Latest vipstyle has an article on radiusing fenders... looks tempting!

On my G50 not much of an issue, but on the Benz..as any Benz owner knows..the rear tucks even under regular "un-dumped" conditions.

[QUOTE=fatfree;64708] But when I have this kind of stance, many people keep saying "you need to lower the front, it's too high", and that all  my rim VS fender gap needs to be all the same.
[/QUOTE]

Interestingly enough... the lower you are, the less of a (visual) issue that becomes...

i dont like the rake/bulldog look too much. i like cars with an even chassis

i used to like the rear tucked more, but lately ive been into the car being level. and no, this doesnt mean making the back higher. it means making the front lower to compensate. ideally the car will be on the frame and level all around.

Yea i am a partial to the low level look...

I like my fender gap even.