Same size lip front and rear
I wasn't planning on it, but turns out my wheels have the same 4.5" lip front and rear. What are everyone's thoughts on this? I could run a higher offset wheel in the front with a spacer for a smaller lip, but that seems like a waste
View original BBCode
I wasn't planning on it, but turns out my wheels have the same 4.5" lip front and rear. What are everyone's thoughts on this? I could run a higher offset wheel in the front with a spacer for a smaller lip, but that seems like a waste
i like it when the lip is the same size front and back. What offsets are u running?
View original BBCode
i like it when the lip is the same size front and back. What offsets are u running?
19x10 +0 245/35, 19x11 +11 275/30
View original BBCode
19x10 +0 245/35, 19x11 +11 275/30
Its not the size of the lip that counts, its how you use it!
Having the same amount of poke front and rear is more important than having X inches of lip...
View original BBCode
Its not the size of the lip that counts, its how you use it!
Having the same amount of poke front and rear is more important than having X inches of lip...
adn jesujs christ get some different tire sizes
View original BBCode
adn jesujs christ get some different tire sizes
I know fitment is more important, that's not what I'm asking. I'm just wondering if it's gonna look wierd with the same lip f&r. guess I'll find out for myself later this week
Yokotas13;66271 wrote:adn jesujs christ get some different tire sizes
why?
View original BBCode
I know fitment is more important, that's not what I'm asking. I'm just wondering if it's gonna look wierd with the same lip f&r. guess I'll find out for myself later this week
[QUOTE=Yokotas13;66271]adn jesujs christ get some different tire sizes[/QUOTE]
why?
cvc9216;66282 wrote:I know fitment is more important, t\
why?
thats why
you will have like balloons on your wheels
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=cvc9216;66282]I know fitment is more important, t\
why?[/QUOTE]
thats why
you will have like balloons on your wheels
He's right, you need to stretch it a bit, I've seen 225 on a 10inch rim, tight fit and he said it was hard to do but it look's SIIICCCKKKK...I'll post a pic....
View original BBCode
He's right, you need to stretch it a bit, I've seen 225 on a 10inch rim, tight fit and he said it was hard to do but it look's SIIICCCKKKK...I'll post a pic....
boost_me;66289 wrote:He's right, you need to stretch it a bit, I've seen 225 on a 10inch rim, tight fit and he said it was hard to do but it look's SIIICCCKKKK...I'll post a pic....
im about to put a 225/40 on a 10...the 35 rubs on full drop
gotta do it for air!
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=boost_me;66289]He's right, you need to stretch it a bit, I've seen 225 on a 10inch rim, tight fit and he said it was hard to do but it look's SIIICCCKKKK...I'll post a pic....[/QUOTE]
im about to put a 225/40 on a 10...the 35 rubs on full drop
gotta do it for air!
Ok the one above is a 17x10in rim with a 225-35.........The one below show's on the left : is a 17x9.5in rim with a 215-35 on it and the right is the 225-35 on a 17x10in rim...Niiccee Stretch!!!!!!!!!!!!........Oh BTW tires are Dunlop SP9000....It's Euro I know.....lol
Thanks- (arigatou)
View original BBCode
[IMG]http://e21.tricord.be/members/sunset323i/DSC02935.jpg[/IMG]
Ok the one above is a 17x10in rim with a 225-35.........The one below show's on the left : is a 17x9.5in rim with a 215-35 on it and the right is the 225-35 on a 17x10in rim...Niiccee Stretch!!!!!!!!!!!!........Oh BTW tires are Dunlop SP9000....It's Euro I know.....lol
[IMG]http://e21.tricord.be/members/sunset323i/DSC03532.jpg[/IMG]
Thanks- (arigatou)
cvc9216;66282 wrote:I know fitment is more important, that's not what I'm asking. I'm just wondering if it's gonna look wierd with the same lip f&r. guess I'll find out for myself later this week
Why would it look wierd? With large lips you cant tell the difference between 3.5 and 4.5". All that matters is how it sits in the fenders. If the front pokes more than the rears it will look wierd
View original BBCode
[quote=cvc9216;66282]I know fitment is more important, that's not what I'm asking. I'm just wondering if it's gonna look wierd with the same lip f&r. guess I'll find out for myself later this week
[/quote]
Why would it look wierd? With large lips you cant tell the difference between 3.5 and 4.5". All that matters is how it sits in the fenders. If the front pokes more than the rears it will look wierd
275/30 isnt that big of a tire for an 11. that shit is prettyyy stretched, we've done it
View original BBCode
275/30 isnt that big of a tire for an 11. that shit is prettyyy stretched, we've done it
>IMO< staggering wheel widths comes from the roots of the automotive industry. as automobiles were developed they were rwd, and had a slightly larger wheel in the rear. this is standard. when running wheels with lips, the result is a larger lip in rear and smaller in front. this becomes even more apparent on high performance vehicles, as they require more clearance for large brakes. width alone, there are also other factors that come into play when maximizing the width of the front wheel, like turning, not taking into consideration lip sizing by disc and offset.
to answer your question, with my opinion, again, i think less lip in front is "nicer" than both being the same. i actually LIKE many of the extremely staggered setups that are infrequently seen on japanese vip cars, ie (very small lip in front, and enormous lip in rear).
although, i think among your peers, the winner is the one with the most lip.
View original BBCode
>IMO< staggering wheel widths comes from the roots of the automotive industry. as automobiles were developed they were rwd, and had a slightly larger wheel in the rear. this is standard. when running wheels with lips, the result is a larger lip in rear and smaller in front. this becomes even more apparent on high performance vehicles, as they require more clearance for large brakes. width alone, there are also other factors that come into play when maximizing the width of the front wheel, like turning, not taking into consideration lip sizing by disc and offset.
to answer your question, with my opinion, again, i think less lip in front is "nicer" than both being the same. i actually LIKE many of the extremely staggered setups that are infrequently seen on japanese vip cars, ie (very small lip in front, and enormous lip in rear).
although, i think among your peers, the winner is the one with the most lip.
As long as it sits right, who cares? If the front pokes out more then the rear the front lips will appear larger.
View original BBCode
As long as it sits right, who cares? If the front pokes out more then the rear the front lips will appear larger.
viplife;66374 wrote:>IMO< staggering wheel widths comes from the roots of the automotive industry. as automobiles were developed they were rwd, and had a slightly larger wheel in the rear. this is standard. when running wheels with lips, the result is a larger lip in rear and smaller in front. this becomes even more apparent on high performance vehicles, as they require more clearance for large brakes. width alone, there are also other factors that come into play when maximizing the width of the front wheel, like turning, not taking into consideration lip sizing by disc and offset.
to answer your question, with my opinion, again, i think less lip in front is "nicer" than both being the same. i actually LIKE many of the extremely staggered setups that are infrequently seen on japanese vip cars, ie (very small lip in front, and enormous lip in rear).
although, i think among your peers, the winner is the one with the most lip.
im with you on that one.
its a self preference. it seems like its bothering you. thats why you made this thread. i felt the same when i had my GS. everyone thought that the wheels had the same size lip all around. but now i went with a smaller lip in front with my Q to show that it is staggered.
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=viplife;66374]>IMO< staggering wheel widths comes from the roots of the automotive industry. as automobiles were developed they were rwd, and had a slightly larger wheel in the rear. this is standard. when running wheels with lips, the result is a larger lip in rear and smaller in front. this becomes even more apparent on high performance vehicles, as they require more clearance for large brakes. width alone, there are also other factors that come into play when maximizing the width of the front wheel, like turning, not taking into consideration lip sizing by disc and offset.
to answer your question, with my opinion, again, i think less lip in front is "nicer" than both being the same. i actually LIKE many of the extremely staggered setups that are infrequently seen on japanese vip cars, ie (very small lip in front, and enormous lip in rear).
although, i think among your peers, the winner is the one with the most lip.[/QUOTE]
im with you on that one.
its a self preference. it seems like its bothering you. thats why you made this thread. i felt the same when i had my GS. everyone thought that the wheels had the same size lip all around. but now i went with a smaller lip in front with my Q to show that it is staggered.
don't worry guys about the front poking more than the rear. that's not what I'm asking! the clearance/camber will be similar f&r. I don't like the typical mild front fitment/insane rear. That's why I moved to a more aggressive size in the front. My ONLY question was the lip issue since I haven't seen too many cars with the same lip f&r. ok? I just got the rear tires mounted so I will find out soon enough if I like it.
Yokotas13;66284 wrote:thats why
you will have like balloons on your wheels
while I like stretched tires as much as the next guy, I think stretching just for the hell of it is dumb. 245 and 275 WILL be stretched. Mildly, but enough to clear for my setup. I may go with a 235 in the front, but only if it rubs. More stretched tires would make the car look LESS aggressive I think. For example, this looks dumb to me (below). Not trying to shit-talk xk-y33 because his car is bad ass and looks awesome on every other set of wheels he had. Just using it as an example. Would look much better with wider tires as long as the fender clearance was tight

View original BBCode
don't worry guys about the front poking more than the rear. that's not what I'm asking! the clearance/camber will be similar f&r. I don't like the typical mild front fitment/insane rear. That's why I moved to a more aggressive size in the front. My ONLY question was the lip issue since I haven't seen too many cars with the same lip f&r. ok? I just got the rear tires mounted so I will find out soon enough if I like it.
[QUOTE=Yokotas13;66284]thats why
you will have like balloons on your wheels[/QUOTE]
while I like stretched tires as much as the next guy, I think stretching just for the hell of it is dumb. 245 and 275 WILL be stretched. Mildly, but enough to clear for my setup. I may go with a 235 in the front, but only if it rubs. More stretched tires would make the car look LESS aggressive I think. For example, this looks dumb to me (below). Not trying to shit-talk xk-y33 because his car is bad ass and looks awesome on every other set of wheels he had. Just using it as an example. Would look much better with wider tires as long as the fender clearance was tight
[img]http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e10/purehawaii/IMG_0088.jpg[/img]
I'm sorry but that look's cool.
View original BBCode
I'm sorry but that look's cool.