Thread #7789

Saggy pants issue.......

21 archived posts · 834 historical views

DriftGirlNovember 15, 2007
#106816

Saggy pants issue.......

A ban on saggy pants
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
11/14/2007
PINE LAWN- Telvin McKinney stopped into the Crown Food Mart after school Tuesday to buy some chips or cookies. The clerk noticed his plaid boxers peeking out of his low-riding pants, just as a police car was parking outside the store. "You better pull them pants up," she warned Telvin, 16.
Telvin quickly yanked up the waistband and tightened his belt. "Oh, I forgot where I was there for a second," he said.
Word was spreading quickly around town that the city's Board of Aldermen passed an ordinance Monday night outlawing what's popularly known as sagging.

Now, anyone who wears pants below the waist that expose the skivvies or skin is subject to a $100 fine. That includes girls whose low-rise jeans sit too low. Parents face up to a $500 fine or 90 days in jail if they knowingly allow their children to wear their pants in such a manner.
Of course, this brings up an interesting question. What about plumbers?

----------------------------------

Will it soon cover short skirts, short shorts,v-neck shirts,etc??? :shrug:
View original BBCode
[B][SIZE=5]A ban on saggy pants[/SIZE][/B]
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
11/14/2007
PINE LAWN- Telvin McKinney stopped into the Crown Food Mart after school Tuesday to buy some chips or cookies. The clerk noticed his plaid boxers peeking out of his low-riding pants, just as a police car was parking outside the store. "You better pull them pants up," she warned Telvin, 16.
Telvin quickly yanked up the waistband and tightened his belt. "Oh, I forgot where I was there for a second," he said.
Word was spreading quickly around town that the city's Board of Aldermen passed an ordinance Monday night outlawing what's popularly known as sagging. 
 
Now, anyone who wears pants below the waist that expose the skivvies or skin is subject to a $100 fine. [B]That includes[/B] [B]girls [/B]whose [B]low-rise jeans[/B] sit too low. Parents face up to a $500 fine or 90 days in jail if they knowingly allow their children to wear their pants in such a manner. 
Of course, this brings up an interesting question. What about plumbers?
 
----------------------------------
 
Will it soon cover short skirts, short shorts,v-neck shirts,etc??? :shrug:
OGNovember 15, 2007
#106839
they did this somewhere in texas too. good luck. this is gonna be one of those laws thats forgot about and they make a commercial out of in 50 years. i really can't believe this is happening. world-wide dress code? wtf? its an obvious attempt at legal harassment of lower class youths. i'm sure its a ticket offense, but of course "i gotta search you for your safety and mine". i wish a mother f**ker would tell me to pull my pants up. and then they're gonna strip search you in the middle of the d**n street! i wanna see the ratio of low-income black males 15-25 yrs old to upper-middle white females on this one. wrong on so many levels.
View original BBCode
they did this somewhere in texas too. good luck. this is gonna be one of those laws thats forgot about and they make a commercial out of in 50 years. i really can't believe this is happening. world-wide dress code? wtf? its an obvious attempt at legal harassment of lower class youths. i'm sure its a ticket offense, but of course "i gotta search you for your safety and mine". i wish a mother f**ker would tell me to pull my pants up. and then they're gonna strip search you in the middle of the d**n street! i wanna see the ratio of low-income black males 15-25 yrs old to upper-middle white females on this one. wrong on so many levels.
DriftGirlNovember 15, 2007
#106852
^^^ I agree 100%
View original BBCode
^^^ I agree 100%
CaoboyNovember 15, 2007
#106857
That's retarded. I mean, we had that rule in middle school, but that was about it. Um, isn't this breaking the freedom of expression amendment? it's not like you are exposing yourself publicly.
View original BBCode
That's retarded. I mean, we had that rule in middle school, but that was about it. Um, isn't this breaking the freedom of expression amendment? it's not like you are exposing yourself publicly.
augdoggNovember 15, 2007
#106867
I guess that's what happens when ppl get some authority. I don't agree w/ it because it seems like a wasted issue, but @ the same time all kinds of laws are broken everyday. Especially the ones that do make sense. Ppl know the laws and just don't abide by them because of their beliefs or because they feel the need to promote the concept of freedom. We need to feel like we have control of our expressions and/opinions to support individuality and/or independence, but actually we come off as being selfish or my favorite insabordinate. What do we do or why do we care? We don't keep up with city meetings or promote change on a positive level. Just complain about how " I was kickin it wit my boys and a cop gave me a ticket fo my saggy duds!" Yos, I don't care what ppl choose to do as long as they do SOMETHING. You choose your reality IMO.:pat:That's all I got to say, now i'ma goin to get my FREE milkshake! Thx again Osacr!
View original BBCode
I guess that's what happens when ppl get some authority. I don't agree w/ it because it seems like a wasted issue, but @ the same time all kinds of laws are broken everyday. Especially the ones that do make sense. Ppl know the laws and just don't abide by them because of their beliefs or because they feel the need to promote the concept of freedom. We need to feel like we have control of our expressions and/opinions to support individuality and/or independence, but actually we come off as being selfish or my favorite insabordinate. What do we do or why do we care? We don't keep up with city meetings or promote change on a positive level. Just complain about how " I was kickin it wit my boys and a cop gave me a ticket fo my saggy duds!" Yos, I don't care what ppl choose to do as long as they do SOMETHING. You choose your reality IMO.:pat:That's all I got to say, now i'ma goin to get my FREE milkshake! Thx again Osacr!
MR. LS400November 16, 2007
#106915
DriftGirl;106816 wrote:Will it soon cover short skirts, short shorts,v-neck shirts,etc??? :shrug:


I couldn't agree more! Where does it end? Can somebody say subliminal Communism (Spelling?)
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=DriftGirl;106816]Will it soon cover short skirts, short shorts,v-neck shirts,etc??? :shrug:[/QUOTE]

I couldn't agree more!  Where does it end?  Can somebody say subliminal Communism (Spelling?)
urmyhero4nowNovember 16, 2007
#106917
oh jesus. try this is california...BUAHAHAHA.:smiley-rofl:
View original BBCode
oh jesus. try this is california...BUAHAHAHA.:smiley-rofl:
guymx83November 16, 2007
#106919
lol.... you guys know that sagging originated in prison, the guys in prison sagged to show they were "open" as in "yeah do me" or how every you want to put it.

i dont sag.... i cant lie, i used to sag... but eh you grow out of it.


i rember back in elementry , they had a tuck in shirt rule. :D
View original BBCode
lol.... you guys know that sagging originated in prison, the guys in prison sagged to show they were "open" as in "yeah do me" or how every you want to put it.

i dont sag.... i cant lie, i used to sag... but eh you grow out of it. 


i rember back in elementry , they had a tuck in shirt rule. :D
phrosttz0November 16, 2007
#106922
yea try makin that law in New York! ha
View original BBCode
yea try makin that law in New York! ha
CaoboyNovember 16, 2007
#107064
guymx83;106919 wrote:lol.... you guys know that sagging originated in prison, the guys in prison sagged to show they were "open" as in "yeah do me" or how every you want to put it.


I have heard that too. I also heard when I was a kid, that baggy pants started so gangsters could hide guns in their pants. IDK. People tell you things to get you to not do things, so who knows if they were just rumors or not.
View original BBCode
[quote=guymx83;106919]lol.... you guys know that sagging originated in prison, the guys in prison sagged to show they were "open" as in "yeah do me" or how every you want to put it.
[/quote]

I have heard that too. I also heard when I was a kid, that baggy pants started so gangsters could hide guns in their pants.  IDK. People tell you things to get you to not do things, so who knows if they were just rumors or not.
DriftGirlNovember 16, 2007
#107073
...or that it originated from inmates who are on the row and not allowed to have belts.


but this thread isnt really about saggin'
View original BBCode
...or that it originated from inmates who are on the row and not allowed to have belts. 
 
 
but this thread isnt really about saggin'
OGNovember 16, 2007
#107078
penicillin started out as bread mold too...
View original BBCode
penicillin started out as bread mold too...
CaoboyNovember 16, 2007
#107086
DriftGirl;107073 wrote:...or that it originated from inmates who are on the row and not allowed to have belts.


but this thread isnt really about saggin'


i thought this thread was all about sagging? haha or on the lines of banning it.
View original BBCode
[quote=DriftGirl;107073]...or that it originated from inmates who are on the row and not allowed to have belts. 
 
 
but this thread isnt really about saggin'[/quote]

i thought this thread was all about sagging? haha or on the lines of banning it.
DriftGirlNovember 16, 2007
#107092
LoL!! it is...but more of a rights issue.

A lot of forums have posting similar threads with supporters of the ban. they feel to realize that it isnt all about saggin pants.

Kinda like when that senator rear ended a car and claimed he thought traffic was still moving because the car on the side of him had 'spinners'. Hella people in our tuner scene were like, yeah ban them....I hate spinners anyway. If his law had pasted it wouldve opened up the flood gates on the aftermarket world. A lot of people get caught up in their own world and fail to see the 'bigger picture'.
View original BBCode
LoL!! it is...but more of a [I]rights[/I] issue. 
 
A lot of forums have posting similar threads with supporters of the ban. they feel to realize that it isnt all about [I]saggin pants[/I].  
 
Kinda like when that senator rear ended a car and claimed he thought traffic was still moving because the car on the side of him had 'spinners'. Hella people in our tuner  scene were like, yeah ban them....I hate spinners anyway.  If his law had pasted it wouldve opened up the flood gates on the aftermarket world. A lot of people get caught up in their own world and fail to see the 'bigger picture'.
CaoboyNovember 16, 2007
#107108
I see what you mean. Why aren't people motioning for this law to be revoked then? I assume, like what was said above, is that it's a law people will feel that it's just going to get lost and forgotten, due to the ridiculousness of it.
View original BBCode
I see what you mean. Why aren't people motioning for this law to be revoked then? I assume, like what was said above, is that it's a law people will feel that it's just going to get lost and forgotten, due to the ridiculousness of it.
DriftGirlNovember 16, 2007
#107123
Its scarrrrry because its targeted towards people who are generally from poor hoods that cant afford to challenge it in court. it will spread thru the poor areas around the nation until its seen as 'the norm'. Then other cities/states will try their hand at adopting it.

Middle and upper class wont see it as 'their' issue....until lil suzy comes home with a phat ass ticket for wearin low rise jeans or sumthin'.


Then shit will hit the fan.



kinda like crack back in the day :smiley:
View original BBCode
Its scarrrrry because its targeted towards people who are generally from poor hoods that cant afford to challenge it in court.  it will spread thru the poor areas around the nation until its seen as 'the norm'. Then other cities/states will try their hand at adopting it.  
 
Middle and upper class wont see it as 'their' issue....until [I]lil suzy[/I] comes home with a phat ass ticket for wearin low rise jeans or sumthin'.
 
 
 Then shit will hit the fan. 
 
 
 
kinda like crack back in the day :smiley:
guymx83November 17, 2007
#107193
crack :slap:

if one of my homies did drugs i personally will kick there ass.....


on the other hand... i say let people wear what they want. i can understand that maybe it would be wrong to sag in a inapropriate location.

let the people decide. vote.
View original BBCode
crack   :slap:

if one of my homies did drugs i personally will kick there ass.....


on the other hand... i say let people wear what they want. i can understand that maybe it would be wrong to sag in a inapropriate location.

let the people decide. vote.
freshMay 22, 2008
#158521
what happen to our rights? why cant people wear what they want. i remember i had some shorts when i was younger it looked like sagging because one pair was sewn about 3 inches past the first one.
View original BBCode
what happen to our rights? why cant people wear what they want. i remember i had some shorts when i was younger it looked like sagging because one pair was sewn about 3 inches past the first one.
widebody_QMay 23, 2008
#158799
lol. This is too funny
View original BBCode
lol.  This is too funny
firelizardMay 24, 2008
#158986
lol, that's so stupid

If I wear cloth shorts, that's legal, if I put pants over them and the shorts still show it's illegal?

I guess I better zip up my hoodie so my [Shoe Fetish] t-shirt is hidden too lol
View original BBCode
lol, that's so stupid

If I wear cloth shorts, that's legal, if I put pants over them and the shorts still show it's illegal?

I guess I better zip up my hoodie so my [Shoe Fetish] t-shirt is hidden too lol
chrispyMay 24, 2008
#159002
It shouldn't be illegal but sagging pants are for clowns.
View original BBCode
It shouldn't be illegal but sagging pants are for clowns.