Thread #22142

Offset confirmation

5 archived posts · 531 historical views

waijaiJune 13, 2010
#326889

Offset confirmation

To me it looks like it should be more aggressive than the posted #'s.

20x9 +26
20x10 +28

Forum image
Forum image
View original BBCode
To me it looks like it should be more aggressive than the posted #'s.

20x9 +26
20x10 +28

[img]http://og-made.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/sessionsls2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://og-made.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/sessionsls1.jpg[/img]
widebody_QJune 13, 2010
#326892
You are right unless there was a typo and the sizes are 9.5" and 10.5"
View original BBCode
You are right unless there was a typo and the sizes are 9.5" and 10.5"
BlitzJune 13, 2010
#326900
I did some calculations on AME website with these wheels.... and with those specs on that type of car it doesn't look too far off judging by the lip sizes. The rears could be right but the fronts if those are aftermarket fenders then yeah somethings wrong.

hi-disk 61mm lip front
super low disk 97mm rear lip

With those face design how its convex it gives abit more lip. Anyways I think it might be right or he might have used some spacers...
View original BBCode
I did some calculations on AME website with these wheels.... and with those specs on that type of car it doesn't look too far off judging by the lip sizes.   The rears could be right but the fronts if those are aftermarket fenders then yeah somethings wrong.    

hi-disk 61mm lip front
super low disk 97mm rear lip

With those face design how its convex it gives abit more lip.   Anyways I think it might be right or he might have used some spacers...
CubanGSJune 13, 2010
#326908
Blitz;326900 wrote:...or he might have used some spacers...


x2
View original BBCode
[QUOTE=Blitz;326900]...or he might have used some spacers...[/QUOTE]

x2